The Climate Change Hoax

Rising Conservative Voices on Climate Alarmism

Karl Michael Season 1 Episode 21

What if everything you've been told about climate change is a cleverly orchestrated narrative designed to control you? This episode of the Climate Change Hoax Podcast, hosted by Karl Michael, is your go-to source for challenging the mainstream climate change dogma. We dissect the motivations of different groups involved in the climate debate, inspired by Dr. Richard Lindzen's insights. From UN-associated scientists to skeptical experts, and the politicians and media profiting off fear, we expose a complex web of interests. You’ll gain a new perspective on why the dialogue has been so one-sided and how conservative voices are beginning to rise and counter the alarmism that has dominated the conversation for so long.

Join us as we scrutinize recent climate protest actions and their often chaotic and dangerous outcomes. While respecting the right to protest, Karl makes a compelling case against tactics that risk public safety, highlighting the potential dangers they pose to innocent bystanders. This episode is a wake-up call for those who refuse to be caught in the cycle of fear and manipulation. Listen to the show for an unapologetically raw discussion of one of the most contentious topics today, and don't forget to like, rate, and review if you appreciate our no-holds-barred approach.

Speaker 1:

The Climate Change Hoax. If you're suspicious that this climate change stuff may be exaggerated or just total BS, you've come to the right place. Welcome to the Climate Change Hoax Podcast With your host, carl Michael. Here you'll learn the truth about the deceivers who want you to believe we can actually control the weather. We cannot. The real goal is to control you. This is the Climate Change Hoax.

Speaker 2:

Greetings climate deniers. If you listen to, read or watch anything coming from the climate alarmists, their hysterical warnings of dreadful consequences caused by global warming and climate change are always based on a scientific consensus. They insist that the science is settled and refuse to listen to opposing opinions. They demand action. Have you ever noticed how leftists are always demanding something? They also claim we must act now, as the majority of scientists agree with them? Well, claiming a scientific consensus and the science is settled is just ridiculous. But then again, to quote Richard Linson, everything about this is sort of nuts and according to Dr Linson, there are three groups of people dealing with this climate issue. Group 1 are scientists that are associated with the United Nations International Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC, their assertion that our use of fossil fuels releases too much CO2 into the atmosphere and with this cult-like belief that this will eventually heat the earth to dangerous levels. Now, group 2 is made up of scientists who don't see this as much of a problem and are often referred to by Group 1 as skeptics. Group 3 are the politicians, the environmentalists and the media and, as I have said before and as Dr Linson points out, this climate change hogwash provides politicians with money and power. Environmentalists with money for their organizations and recognition for their cult-like belief that man is a destructive force. And, ultimately, hands-to-media scenarios of doom and gloom headlines that make them money. Scenarios of doom and gloom headlines that make them money. And, according to Dr Linson, group 3 is winning the argument by drowning out the serious debate that should be happening, and on this point he is right. I would also add, group 3 sees opportunities for pushing their socialist agendas.

Speaker 2:

However, I am starting to see a change, a sort of awakening. For instance, if you search for podcasts about the climate, 90 plus percent of them are the views, opinions and demands of the alarmists. However, I have noticed many of these alarmist podcasts are no longer current. Some of these shows' last episodes are two and sometimes three years old. What happened are two and sometimes three years old. What happened?

Speaker 2:

Well, now that Group 2 has their own voice through conservative media and podcasts not unlike this one, the pragmatic population in this country are pushing back, and our refusal to obey infuriates Group 3 to the point of doing some really stupid things. Just recently, a bunch of climate wackos decided to block a major highway around DC, demanding Biden stop the use of oil and gas. These idiots are the product of a constant barrage of doom-and-gloom fear porn put out by the WEF and other leftist organizations. Most of these domestic terrorists are nothing but angry old hippies left over from the 60s. It may even be actors hired by extremist groups like, oh, the Democratic Party.

Speaker 2:

Regardless, I would like to point out the seriousness of such a dangerously stupid act. What if someone needed to get to an important job interview? By the way, that actually happened. What if your loving husband or wife of 40 years was having a heart attack? What if a woman was having her baby and it was breach? What if an ambulance was rushing a dying patient to the hospital? What if some psychopath decides to empty a couple of clips at motorists trapped in their very un-bulletproof cars? I'm sure you can think of some very serious outcomes. But the point is, you climate alarmists unfortunately have the right to your opinion and the right to protest. You do not have the right to cause, or potentially cause, harm to others while you throw your little tantrums. By the way, it is also illegal. Three of them refused to leave and they went to jail. It was stupid, arrogant and dangerous, dangerous even for you protesters, as some unpleasant consequences may have befallen you fools If my wife was caught in that traffic and had to pee cheers.

Speaker 1:

You've been listening to the climate change hoax. We hope you've enjoyed the show. If you did, make sure to like, rate and review.

Speaker 2:

See you next time on the climate change hoax.